03-07-2017, 05:39 PM
(03-07-2017, 04:43 PM)McC Wrote: The raw numbers don't tell the whole story. Did they trot out an under performing veteran instead of giving a rookie a shot? Were rookies playing because they were that good or because there was no choice but play them? Were rookies handed jobs they may or may not have deserved?
Probably too many factors involved to draw any real conclusions based on the numbers alone.
That is the thing, sometimes shitty coaching forces teams to play rookies as well. Or like last year when two of our
top WR's left for big dough. Or when your QB and owner are at odds so you have to draft a rookie QB and start him
(03-07-2017, 05:04 PM)bengals67 Wrote: exactly right
How many of the "rookie" starting games by Marv player equates to Z who we are about to let go after wasting a first round pick on a position we do not value enough to give a second contract.
We will be playing more rookies this year than in a long time if we lose, Whitworth, Zeitler and Burkhead i am sure.
Won't be good if this is the case.
