03-10-2017, 02:33 PM
(03-10-2017, 02:25 PM)muskiesfan Wrote: I get that, but he was still playing at a very high level. I think the loyal to a fault goes more to the coaching staff than players, but that's just my opinion. Again, better to let them go too early than too late, but I feel they should've kept Whitworth. On the flip side, would keeping Whit have prevented them from keeping DreK?Pacmans unknown status has certainly put the team in a bind. They should have cut him the day the tape surfaced. It probably would have helped with negotiations for both players but then again it appears the Bengals didn't want to commit to 36 year old Whit long term and rightfully so IMO. So yeah, they could have made room by cutting fat for sure but the Rams deal proved Whit wanted more. I'm interested in seeing if they made the right move.
