03-10-2017, 02:50 PM
(03-10-2017, 02:33 PM)Atomic Orange Wrote: Pacmans unknown status has certainly put the team in a bind. They should have cut him the day the tape surfaced. It probably would have helped with negotiations for both players but then again it appears the Bengals didn't want to commit to 36 year old Whit long term and rightfully so IMO. So yeah, they could have made room by cutting fat for sure but the Rams deal proved Whit wanted more. I'm interested in seeing if they made the right move.
I completely agree that Pacman should be on the streets. Every day that Hobson keeps saying he's staying pisses me off a little more. I get they don't like dead money, but how do you justify keeping this guy after yet another embarrassment. I get not wanting to cut Pac before signing Dre because it would only give Dre more leverage, but if cutting Pac would've let them keep Dre and Whit, it's even a bigger mistake to keep Pac on the roster.