03-14-2017, 11:16 AM
(03-14-2017, 11:05 AM)Deanlj69 Wrote: I'm sorry but this is nothing more than a troll thread. Football players and the coaches in a lot of ways are comparable to managing a large department. You can have a great manager who develops great employees which breeds a very successful department and if that manager leaves the department it doesn't immediately become unsuccessful overnight those employees were taught the right way and the previous manager knew talent and hired that talent and created a culture to foster and tsp into their abilities
In football it's the same thing. I see people say Paul Alexander is a great coach trust the process if great players are drafted despite subpar coaching players can develop on their own due to their own hard work but as in business with a great manager a great coach will take a player who has natural traits and build them up and that's where were lacking. Don't tell me the process and trusting it. Players can't succeed despite subpar or bad coaching if they have the right work ethic.
I feel Paul Guenther falls in the same category, with him it's strictly my opinion and only time will tell but who has he truly developed or coached up beyond expectations? Who has Alexander done the same with? I know with Alexander we can point to numerous prospects Who never developed. Now I know that can happen to anyone but his track record does not seem to be the greatest
Regardless I feel this whole thread which I tried to stay out of was nothing more than Clickbait and trolling
So basically every player who suceeds gets all the credit himself and every player who fails the blame goes to the coach.
Make an assumption based on nothing but your own beliefs then dismiss any evidence that shows you are wrong.
"If a player sucks it is the fault of the bad Benglas coaches, but if a player is good the coach gets no credit because it is all about the player."