03-14-2017, 01:43 PM
(03-14-2017, 01:39 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Bullshit, fred. You claimed the Bengals couldn't re-sign Andrews because Wille wouldn't take a pay cut. That statement can't be explained by simply misreading "Andrews" as "Anderson."
But, let's try it anyway: The Bengals wanted to re-sign "Anderson," but couldn't because "Andrews" wouldn't take a pay cut.
See? Your explanation is bullshit. And your explanation of your explanation is . . .
It was a mistake. I admit it. I explained why the Bengals did not keep "Anderson" when someone actually asked why they did not keep "Andrews". Not really that hard to understand.
Are you seriously going to argue with me even when I admit I made a mistake?