Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mike is setting everyone up for heartache
#77
(03-28-2017, 09:44 PM)WeezyBengal Wrote: Sorry, but how exactly is this reasonable? 

Why should tax payers have to foot the bill for an owners stadium? 

NFL owners have been taking advantage of the general public for far too long. Teams are moving cities because the owners get butt hurt and don't want to pony up money for THEIR stadium when the public votes the stadium tax down. Im honestly glad St. Louis and Oakland voted their stadium tax proposition down. Im glad some of these citizens have the balls to stand up to such greedy owners and the NFL in general. 

The NFL is becoming a joke and society is so twisted these days. How about instead of NFL owners expecting the public to pay for their multi billion dollar stadiums by tax, we offer up a tax that will help out schools or some sort of social service that will improve the cities social or developmental landscape? 

Shit makes me sick. 

I was referring to the quote in the OP. If they hadn't been able to get a deal done in cincy then they would have had to look elsewhere. Makes sense and seems reasonable to me. What would you prefer he say? If we can't build a stadium in cincy we will close up shop and the NFL can play with 31 teams? 
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Mike is setting everyone up for heartache - leonardfan40 - 03-28-2017, 11:06 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)