Sell me on WRs not being taken in the 1st round

[Whatever]

(03-29-2017, 11:22 PM)Hammerstripes Wrote: You give a lot of good reasons for not only taking a WR, but actually getting a threat at RB so we aren't so dependent on the passing game.  If you get a guy that teams have to account for running the ball, there's going to be a lot of openings for the WRs and TEs. 

Definitely.  RB is a big need, as well.  Gio is coming back from major injury.  Hill is mediocre and in a contract year.  Peerman is a glorified ST's guy.  If you can get a value on a RB in the first three rounds, you have to consider it.