04-05-2017, 12:31 PM
(04-05-2017, 10:05 AM)Burma Wrote: Possibly. Based on the site I used they had Taco as #9 so went with that.
maybe one site of many I have looked at have him that high
Burma's NFL.com mock 1.0
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Burma's NFL.com mock 1.0 - Burma - 03-28-2017, 02:19 PM
RE: Burma's NFL.com mock 1.0 - lostpoet2 - 03-28-2017, 04:33 PM
RE: Burma's NFL.com mock 1.0 - Hammerstripes - 03-28-2017, 05:53 PM
RE: Burma's NFL.com mock 1.0 - Burma - 03-28-2017, 06:38 PM
RE: Burma's NFL.com mock 1.0 - pulses - 03-28-2017, 09:48 PM
RE: Burma's NFL.com mock 1.0 - lostpoet2 - 03-28-2017, 08:03 PM
RE: Burma's NFL.com mock 1.0 - NATI BENGALS - 03-28-2017, 10:09 PM
RE: Burma's NFL.com mock 1.0 - Whatever - 03-29-2017, 12:29 AM
RE: Burma's NFL.com mock 1.0 - Burma - 04-03-2017, 12:04 PM
RE: Burma's NFL.com mock 1.0 - Essex Johnson - 04-04-2017, 11:38 PM
RE: Burma's NFL.com mock 1.0 - Burma - 04-05-2017, 10:05 AM
RE: Burma's NFL.com mock 1.0 - Essex Johnson - 04-05-2017, 12:31 PM
|