Even with signing minter, you take foster

[Beaker]

(04-08-2017, 03:04 PM)McC Wrote: No thank you.  I'd take Barnett over Foster and I'm not all that crazy about him.

You'd take arguably the third or 4th best DE over the top LB in the draft?

Minter is signed for 1 yr., and LB has been the weak spot on the Bengals  for many seasons now. Its always been some aging veteran, or UFA that they try to fill the LB corps with. Its about time they addressed it in the draft. Foster can rotate and learn from Minter and Burfict for a year. He then gives us leverage next season when Minter's (and Burfict's) contracts are up.

Foster is the BPA if Thomas is gone.