Would you do this deal?

[*Nate (formerly eliminate08)*]

(04-08-2017, 05:22 PM)kevin Wrote: I could see Reddick because he is maybe the fastest LB in the draft and you can't teach speed.  Foster has been considered one of the best players in high school in USA and one of best players in college in USA.  He is considered the hardest hitter on defense in the draft and not just LB, the hardest hitter in the draft.  Burfict hits pretty hard also. Burfict and Foster could flat out clobber people.  If it's Reddick, fine.  WE need a LB.  We have not drafted a top LB in a long time and it shows.  We keep putting a bandaid on with over the hill guys like Harrison, Hawk, Dansby.   If the LSU RB is not there, it's high time we grab a top LB.   Many mock drafts have us drafting Foster, but Reddick at least is a LB.   I do not want us taking another TE or CB. That's all we draft anymore and the rest of the team is suffering from it. 

Some good points here. Don't get me wrong, i would not be mad if we picked Foster at 9 but there are concerns
with him. Sure, he hits hard but he could also get flagged a lot here. Maybe Burfict could help him with keeping his
head up as that was Burfict's problem too for awhile.

Reddick is really flying up my board and i like him better than Foster now at 9.

We need pass rushers, a Center and a RB this draft. Minter only signing a one year deal should make no impact on
us drafting a LB, i would be fine with Reddick or Foster at 9.

I don't even think we need to draft a CB, we are stacked there. But in this deep draft for TE's i hope we get one of
them, Michael Roberts out of Toledo in the 4th would be great.