Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
It HAS To Be RB Fournette or LB Foster
#42
(04-09-2017, 01:27 PM)t3r3e3 Wrote: If Minter balls out this year, he will be too expensive to re-sign.  Burfict is the Will, but he's also slow and not a true sideline to sideline LB.  Putting a true run and chase guy like Foster at Will and shifting Burfict over to the strong side would upgrade two spots, and would also give the option of playing both in nickel sets.  If Minter leaves after 2017, then the team can decide who plays Will and who plays the Mike.  All that aside, I still am intrigued by Reddick.

Minter didn't have a ton of suitors this year, and it's a stretch to say his market value will explode next year.  That's like saying we don't need a pass rusher because Wil Clarke is going to have a 10 sack year.

LB isn't a premium position in a 4-3, and we play nickel more than a base 4-3.  We've got two well paid starters, two 3rd rounders, and a well paid backup, and we're supposed to throw a Top 10 pick at the position, too?

What in the world makes Foster this can't miss prospect?  He's undersized, his instincts are terrible, has concussion and shoulder issues, and had a melt down at the combine after numerous poor interviews.  On top of it, he has 7 sacks, no picks, no forced fumbles, and no fumble recoveries in college.  He doesn't make enough big plays to justify a Top 10 pick, bottom line.  
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: It HAS To Be RB Fournette or LB Foster - Whatever - 04-09-2017, 04:26 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)