04-11-2017, 12:09 PM
(04-11-2017, 12:02 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Because they might view #33 overall for AJM a little too pricey. And the Bengals may end up in a spot at #9 where no real standout player is there, so trading back a few spots gaining #33 overall by dropping McCarron might be worth doing. Was just a thought.
They might. We might value aj more than 33. Personally the minimum i take for him is a 2nd and a 3rd next year.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk