04-19-2017, 10:43 AM
(04-18-2017, 05:01 PM)eoxyod Wrote: Problem is Mike Williams ranks in the lower percentiles in a lot of factors relating to explosiveness and comparative speed. He also ranked a playmaker score of only 70% which isn't necessarily bad, but not worth a high pick. Most good first round WRs get a playmaker score of over 70%. A WR the size of Williams should rank much higher from TD catches, but didn't catch TDs compared to that especially with a great QB at the helm. He also had a very average YPC average which should be higher for a WR that is supposed to high point deep passes much better.
Similarly, he compares athletically to Laquon Treadwell who has had a rough start in the NFL. He doesn't have the separation ability that other WR prospects have which is much mroe important than just being big. More WRs with his measurable and same supposed "wow" factor fail than succeed
You make some good points, however, I am not concerned with the Laquon Treadwell comparisons I have heard from many people.
Treadwell is only 6 foot 2 inches tall as compared to Mike Williams at 6 foot 3 and 5/8 inches.
Treadwell posted a 4.63 forty time compared to Mike Williams time of 4.50 with an extra inch and 5/8 of height.
I think he will be much better than Treadwell but you have a valid point to consider..
