Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Soloman Thomas # 9??
#21
(04-20-2017, 12:30 PM)Whatever Wrote: He has good production in a big boy conference, great athletic traits, and is very young.  That's what the hype is about.  He has a very high ceiling and a high floor.

Barnett is undersized and won't hold up against the run.  He is strictly a pass rush specialist as a rookie.  He is only 259 pounds, and watching video of his Pro Day, he's carrying a lot of bad weight around his midsection.  I don't know if he can put on enough muscle mass to be a 3 down player.  

With Thomas, we usually move Atkins to NT and slide a DE in at UT on obvious passing downs, anyways.  Thomas can slide down and we can bring in Clarke st RDE.

Spot on about both players. Solomon would be a 3 down End for us if we needed him to be immediately.

Barnett wouldn't, simple as that. But we are needing a pass rush specialist so i would be fine with Barnett.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Soloman Thomas # 9?? - Steve - 04-19-2017, 10:29 PM
RE: Soloman Thomas # 9?? - CJD - 04-19-2017, 10:32 PM
RE: Soloman Thomas # 9?? - J24 - 04-19-2017, 11:40 PM
RE: Soloman Thomas # 9?? - CJD - 04-19-2017, 11:45 PM
RE: Soloman Thomas # 9?? - J24 - 04-20-2017, 12:09 AM
RE: Soloman Thomas # 9?? - CJD - 04-20-2017, 07:51 AM
RE: Soloman Thomas # 9?? - Crowe - 04-20-2017, 08:22 AM
RE: Soloman Thomas # 9?? - CJD - 04-20-2017, 08:33 AM
RE: Soloman Thomas # 9?? - NATI BENGALS - 04-19-2017, 11:53 PM
RE: Soloman Thomas # 9?? - phil413 - 04-19-2017, 10:51 PM
RE: Soloman Thomas # 9?? - The D.O.Z. - 04-20-2017, 12:11 AM
RE: Soloman Thomas # 9?? - phil413 - 04-20-2017, 12:25 AM
RE: Soloman Thomas # 9?? - J24 - 04-20-2017, 12:46 AM
RE: Soloman Thomas # 9?? - Whatever - 04-20-2017, 12:30 PM
RE: Soloman Thomas # 9?? - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 04-20-2017, 12:39 PM
RE: Soloman Thomas # 9?? - lostpoet2 - 04-20-2017, 11:22 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)