Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Trading McCarron will require...
#47
(04-26-2017, 09:27 PM)jowczarski Wrote: Yeah, I reported it was a first round pick after the 2015 season. It never changed. And I wrote the story about McCarron being "at peace" with it, because he has to be. The Bengals hold all the leverage. There's no reason for them to ask for anything less. And no, the team isn't going to look at AJ to compete with Andy at any point. AJ is considered a very good backup quarterback they feel good about should Andy get hurt.

At any point? this is including next season, not this one but next season even if Andy is struggling?  Is AJ not starting caliber?  If this is the case then why wouldn't we trade him for 2nd or 3rd? (Please note Andy has my full support), it seems as though there are so many positions we could trade AJ for to help improve the team if this is the case.  Also, is this honestly fair for AJ McCarron, the guy has a beautiful college career and can play ball... are the Bengal's squashing a mans career? 
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Trading McCarron will require... - BenZoo2 - 04-25-2017, 10:25 AM
Trading McCarron will require... - BenZoo2 - 04-25-2017, 10:55 AM
RE: Trading McCarron will require... - Marlon23 - 04-26-2017, 09:39 PM
RE: Trading McCarron will require... - J24 - 04-28-2017, 02:54 AM
RE: Trading McCarron will require... - J24 - 04-28-2017, 03:10 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)