Are you happy with the John Ross Pick Poll

[PlayerFormerlyKnownAsMousecop]

(04-28-2017, 12:38 AM)t3r3e3 Wrote: Picking Ross adds a weapon. The problem is that they stayed put and drafted Ross at 9. Multiple teams wanted a QB, and subsequently paid a premium. The Bengals likely could've had Ross in the teens, or Howard, or Hooker, or Reddick.

What people aren't understanding about this trading down thing is the simple concept of supply and demand.

The demand for teams to trade down in this draft was absurdly high, and unfortunately, none of these teams were able to hide that fact. There was so much middle of the pack talent from pick 7 all the way to the 20's. Lots of good talent, not a ton of great talent.

Bengals went high upside here, which is what they always do in the drat. I have no issues with this pick.