08-04-2015, 12:11 AM
(08-04-2015, 12:00 AM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: Because it's a ***** ******** concept. (That because Paul Alexander "coached up" a mid-round pick to be a decent starter, he's obivously a good coach)
Every team league in the league, in probably every single year the league has been in existence, has had middle round players become legitimate starters.
4th round, 5th round, 6th round. 7th round. The league is littered with starting players from these rounds. Because a position group has a a player or two that wasn't drafted in the first couple of rounds, it doesn't automatically mean their position coach is great.
Then why ion the hell did you make a big deal about Paul not being able to develop later round picks into good players? You are talking in circles in order to cover your ass. First you claimed that it was a sign of a good O-line coach to develop mid to late round picks, and now you say that it is meaningless becuase every O-line coach does it.
This is ridiculous. How do you determine if an O-line coach is good or not?
There hjave been lots of high round picks that flop, but Paul has never had one.
Paul has also developed undrafted and lower drafted O-linemen into good starters.
So what else do you want him to do? Everytime I point out what he has done you say it is meaningless.
