06-12-2017, 12:50 PM
(06-12-2017, 12:48 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Could have, but the case I presented is assuming that any remaining money is reserved for extensions. In fact, the Bengals have already spent more than they said they had available for FAs for 2017. So only offering the two options I listed makes the situation simpler by removing more variables.
True, but you left out the most obvious option considering it wasn't that big of a deal.
