06-30-2017, 01:00 AM
When analyst after analyst from site after site puts Andy closer to 20 than to 10 who is wrong? Them or those that say they are wrong. I look at that list and see "about right"' I could make a case that Andy gets the nod over Tannehill and Taylor; however, I could make an equally strong case that Rivers and Smith should be above him.
I find the ranking to be close and the comments to be promising. What do folks want?
I find the ranking to be close and the comments to be promising. What do folks want?