08-03-2017, 12:40 PM
Hey Jim, since you have better access to players, coaches and so on what would be the odds of getting the players and coaches as a group to do a regular ranking of the so called pundits who are forever issuing their own rankings of teams, players and coaches. In other words, turn the game around on them to see what the people who actually are involved in the game think about the people who get to write their nonsense day in, day out.
Of course I'm not saying that you personally write nonsense, but I'm pretty sure you know what I'm getting at here, pundits who seem to think the sun rises and falls on the Squeelers no matter what and who would probably rather have a battery acid enema than say good things about the Bengals ..
I have a hunch that many of the writers and broadcasters would not exactly get shining reviews from most of the players and teams..
Whadaya think?
Of course I'm not saying that you personally write nonsense, but I'm pretty sure you know what I'm getting at here, pundits who seem to think the sun rises and falls on the Squeelers no matter what and who would probably rather have a battery acid enema than say good things about the Bengals ..
I have a hunch that many of the writers and broadcasters would not exactly get shining reviews from most of the players and teams..
Whadaya think?
In the immortal words of my old man, "Wait'll you get to be my age!"
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.