53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The

Hello, Guest! Register

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The

BURROWorBUST Offline

Offline

Special Teams

VIP Bronze

Posts: 2,302
Threads: 114
Reputation: 16494
Joined: May 2015
Location: Boise, Idaho

#4

08-09-2017, 04:46 AM

Can't argue much with TKUHL on this, but damn is going to be hard leaving Nickerson (and maybe Bell) off of this roster.

I've always been a fan of Vinnie Rey's, and he's a boss on STs, but maybe there's a chance the rookie can take his spot.

Flowers is a good kid who's worked hard to stick around this long. Hate to see him go, too. Injuries do happen. Is Evans ready to fill in? I don't know.

Don't know much about Albright, and Dawson's just a headcase. Time to cut our losses on him.

Today I'm TEAM SEWELL. Tomorrow TEAM PITTS. Maybe TEAM CHASE. I can't decide, and glad I don't have to.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - TKUHL - 08-08-2017, 07:57 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Passepartout - 08-08-2017, 08:03 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - leonardfan40 - 08-08-2017, 08:05 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-09-2017, 01:01 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - BURROWorBUST - 08-09-2017, 04:46 AM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - TKUHL - 08-09-2017, 07:48 AM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Wyche'sWarrior - 08-10-2017, 01:36 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Murdock2420 - 08-10-2017, 03:22 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - TKUHL - 08-10-2017, 03:36 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-10-2017, 04:05 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Murdock2420 - 08-10-2017, 04:50 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Bengal Dude - 08-10-2017, 04:56 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - TKUHL - 08-13-2017, 03:37 AM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Murdock2420 - 08-09-2017, 05:49 AM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Storer50 - 08-09-2017, 06:22 AM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Lawless_1 - 08-09-2017, 07:44 AM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - ochocincos - 08-09-2017, 02:57 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - McC - 08-09-2017, 03:46 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - ochocincos - 08-09-2017, 03:52 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - sandwedge - 08-09-2017, 04:24 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - ochocincos - 08-09-2017, 04:33 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-10-2017, 12:33 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - ochocincos - 08-10-2017, 12:38 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-10-2017, 12:42 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - sandwedge - 08-10-2017, 03:56 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Lawless_1 - 08-09-2017, 07:25 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - ochocincos - 08-10-2017, 12:47 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-11-2017, 12:19 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)