53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The

Hello, Guest! Register

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The

TKUHL

Offline

Veteran

VIP Platinum

Posts: 5,607
Threads: 197
Reputation: 14886
Joined: May 2015

#28

08-13-2017, 03:37 AM

(08-10-2017, 04:50 PM)Murdock2420 Wrote: If Lap likes him, probably should keep him around.

It really seems like Lap has the best eye for talent involved with this franchise. I'm sure he is happy as a broadcaster, but seems like a smart move would be to get him more involved with the team.

Would be curious if he would be interested in coaching the line, or be an assistant at least. Munoz as well.

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - TKUHL - 08-08-2017, 07:57 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Passepartout - 08-08-2017, 08:03 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - leonardfan40 - 08-08-2017, 08:05 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-09-2017, 01:01 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - BURROWorBUST - 08-09-2017, 04:46 AM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - TKUHL - 08-09-2017, 07:48 AM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Wyche'sWarrior - 08-10-2017, 01:36 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Murdock2420 - 08-10-2017, 03:22 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - TKUHL - 08-10-2017, 03:36 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-10-2017, 04:05 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Murdock2420 - 08-10-2017, 04:50 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Bengal Dude - 08-10-2017, 04:56 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - TKUHL - 08-13-2017, 03:37 AM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Murdock2420 - 08-09-2017, 05:49 AM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Storer50 - 08-09-2017, 06:22 AM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Lawless_1 - 08-09-2017, 07:44 AM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - ochocincos - 08-09-2017, 02:57 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - McC - 08-09-2017, 03:46 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - ochocincos - 08-09-2017, 03:52 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - sandwedge - 08-09-2017, 04:24 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - ochocincos - 08-09-2017, 04:33 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-10-2017, 12:33 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - ochocincos - 08-10-2017, 12:38 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-10-2017, 12:42 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - sandwedge - 08-10-2017, 03:56 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Lawless_1 - 08-09-2017, 07:25 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - ochocincos - 08-10-2017, 12:47 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-11-2017, 12:19 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)