08-19-2017, 07:13 PM
(08-19-2017, 07:05 PM)Bronze Bengal Wrote: Considering The Redskins have only five playoff appearances with only two wins in the last eighteen years their strategy isn't a very good one.
It's certainly yielded more playoff wins than ours.
People always point out the worst of the worst to show the Bengals strategy isn't bad. The Redskins for free agency. The Browns for overall success.
You can look at most of the recent Super Bowl winners and see key free agents they signed. The Redskins try to build an entire roster through free agency. You can't do that.
The years where we had a good roster would have been prime time to bring that key free agent in. Like had we signed Dansby instead of Harrison. Dansby was a better fit. Harrison was an OLB in the 3-4 and didn't really fit here. But, Harrison was willing to sign for less money than Dansby. Dansby still had some tread left on the tires at that point too...unlike last year.
