08-10-2015, 04:21 AM
(08-09-2015, 11:54 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I'm going to stop you right here. You said we lost our "entire D line". I pointed out how we lost two players, one of which was the best at his position and one who was the 3rd best.First two, I was wrong with, but you somehow act like ridiculing me for being wrong about it means that your team won't be worse because of it.
You then replied that we lost a 3rd guy too. I corrected you and told you he was still on the team.
If we're keeping score, that's 2 Patrick, 0 Brad. Exactly how am I the flawed one?
You then tried to suggest that we'd be better off without Canty despite previously saying that losing him was one of the reasons we were on the decline (don't get your my little pony panties in a bunch, we know you didn't use those exact words).
That's a 3rd flawed argument on your part. Not looking good for ol' Brad.
LOL, he countered your argument that showing how you just contradicted (or countered) yourself in the span of two post. You can't argue he is a loss and then suggest we're better off without him.
That's what's funny, because then other people jump in on it and it makes you feel validated.
I didn't even look into Canty when I made the first comment, but, after looking at it further, I realized that you'd be better off without him.
Remember how you said I claimed victory and then ended every response to a post of mine with "I claim victory" for like a month? Explain to me how you're not claiming victory there.
That's another reason why you're a joke. Can't even engage in a simple debate.
(08-09-2015, 11:58 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: And are you seriously trying to explain again how when you say "80 yards" you really mean "60 yards"? I already told you that all you had to say was "OK, i was using a hyperbole, the point I am getting at was that he has the big play ability to break off pretty big runs". That's cool man, I get what you're saying.
Nope... instead you did the typical Brad bullshit where you couldn't swallow your pride and you tried to suggest I was ridiculous for pointing out that he only ever did what you suggested once. You also got really butt hurt when I quoted you as saying that Hill had a 60 yard run because it was really a 65 yard run. LOL, you said 60, not me. I was just quoting you.
lol.
Again, you continue to ignore the entire point and just go back to the fine print.
Ok, I was using a hyperbole, and yet you continue to use the 15 or 20 extra yards as some solidified proof that he can't break off big runs.
(08-10-2015, 12:06 AM)Tiger Teeth Wrote: Looks like we got the same 'ol Brad back. Can't even smack talk without getting all riled up.
P.S. It really hurts when I have to smack a fellow Bengal fan. Brad, stop.
lol
How was that riled up? That was completely calm and debating.
You're just looking for an excuse to hate.
Carry on.