08-22-2017, 11:13 PM
(08-22-2017, 09:21 PM)GreenCornBengal Wrote: Why is it necessary for the team to get a whooping before they 'realize' they need to play better?
Lap's reasoning for the dismal performance on D vs KC echoes statements made by the Cincinnati Organization for years.
"KC was embarrassed by the 49ers, KC lost upfront to the 49ers... so naturally that is why KC came out and dominated the Bengals upfront. Oh hey, by domino logic, the Bengals should do the same next week to their opponent because they were embarrassed! The parallels are astounding!!"
What is with this domino logic? Why can't the Bengals just perform without needing motivation from the previous week?
How often do we discuss Marvin's record 'after a loss'?
Why does it matter? Team should perform no matter what happened last week.
I understand this is just the rationale that we use to comprehend losing and to give us motivation moving forward, but to me, it happens far too often for this team.
0-7 can make a team cocky I guess?
The real reason is complacency. When an organization like ours leans on the side of loyalty instead of running it like a business, there is less accountability. Therefore, less fear of poor performance and decisions from everyone in the organization down to the mascot.