Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should Bengals keep 2 or 3 QB's
#13
A lot depends on if McCarron is granted the extra year of eligibility or not. If he doesn't become eligible for FA next year, you absolutely keep him or trade him for a second round pick or higher. They believe in him enough as an insurance policy to decline a 2nd rounder this year (allegedly), then I don't think they let him go for less now.

If he is eligible for FA next year, I still think you keep him as a solid backup that could win you some games if Dalton had to miss a few. We don't know if Driskel can do that, but we liked what we have seen enough to pluck him for SF PS a year ago and occupy a spot on the roster all year. They exposed former 3rd rounder PJ Dawson rather than expose Driskel....I think that tells us he won't be going anywhere and will be the back up of the future.

The bottom line: I don't see how we don't keep three.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Should Bengals keep 2 or 3 QB's - Luvnit2 - 08-27-2017, 09:42 AM
RE: Should Bengals keep 2 or 3 QB's - BMK - 08-27-2017, 02:12 PM
RE: Should Bengals keep 2 or 3 QB's - SHRacerX - 08-27-2017, 11:36 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)