Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should Bengals keep 2 or 3 QB's
#31
(08-28-2017, 07:30 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: That was a bad interception by McCarron. Way over the Receiver's head into triple coverage.

Keep all 3 sounds like the best move for the future. Hope McCarron goes crazy in the last game and ups his stock again.

Probably won't matter though as you are correct Wyche and we missed our window in trading the dude.

Can't say for sure if we actually could get a big return ( a high rd2) for McCarron.  Likely even if there WAS a nice offer..it's not on the table now.  As for having 3 QB's?   Well......Do ya feel lucky?  Often the Starter has over 95% of the minutes. HOWEVER.. if our starter is injured and out?    Well...then we scramble to get a backup for the backup.  In this NFL, QB is real major.

I DO agree that in this preseason, Driscoll >> McCarron.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Should Bengals keep 2 or 3 QB's - Luvnit2 - 08-27-2017, 09:42 AM
RE: Should Bengals keep 2 or 3 QB's - BMK - 08-27-2017, 02:12 PM
RE: Should Bengals keep 2 or 3 QB's - redwood - 08-29-2017, 12:28 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)