Burfict facing suspension

[BMK]

(08-29-2017, 03:08 PM)Synric Wrote: See what your not understanding is that Burfict isn't being suspended for hitting a defenseless receiver which would constitue a flag and probably a fine. 

The letter he received and the suspension for Unnecessary Roughness going to the head or neck of a defensless receiver. Which is clearly not the case.

I guess we'll see. The video shows he didn't go helmet to helmet with a defenseless receiver. So if you're right,  they will have to reverse the penalty, and as I said I will stand corrected. 

But, if he does incur any type of suspension, then I was correct, there is obviously more to it than just where he hit the receiver.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/vontaze-burfict-suspension-heres-the-hit-and-why-its-illegal-under-new-nfl-rule/