08-31-2017, 01:42 PM
As with everything business decisions will eventually rule the day. If it's a matter of a few million bucks I suspect Elliott wins out. If you're getting relatively the same product at a lower price it's a no brainer.
Nobody can peer into the future to see who might miss a field goal or PAT and when the competition is so tight you pretty much have to go with the guy you know you can contractually lock up for the long term vs the guy who may be gone the next year of two.. Bullock is in his 6th season. Do the math. Players automatically get a $15,000 raise every season so he'll make at minimum $90,000 more per season.
Nobody can peer into the future to see who might miss a field goal or PAT and when the competition is so tight you pretty much have to go with the guy you know you can contractually lock up for the long term vs the guy who may be gone the next year of two.. Bullock is in his 6th season. Do the math. Players automatically get a $15,000 raise every season so he'll make at minimum $90,000 more per season.
In the immortal words of my old man, "Wait'll you get to be my age!"
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
