09-01-2017, 06:09 PM
(09-01-2017, 11:40 AM)Shake n Blake Wrote: I can't disagree that TE is a need...particularly if the team plans on letting Eifert walk. That said, we have no long-term solution at #2 WR, either. That's a pretty important spot, and a solid 2nd WR can help offset a weakness at TE. So while I get what you're saying about TE, for you to just dismiss the need at WR is kinda disengenuous or ignorant, IMO.
Boyd - Stats aside, he didn't look like anything special. A possession guy with solid hands. Probably best suited as a 3rd or 4th guy on a depth chart. Obviously coaches weren't sold, seeing how they turned right around and took Ross with the 9th pick.
LaFell - Purely a stop gap. 31 years old. Lacks good deep speed.
Core - Scrub. Another hyped guy that isn't going to amount to anything beyond depth.
My man, Shake. You and I tend to agree a lot, but you're killing me with Core. Don't get me wrong, I don't think he's a stud, but far from scrub.
Green is Green. Nuff said.
If Boyd continues producing like he did last year, I think that's solid.
Ross could be the number 2 of the future. Obviously way too early to tell, but we shall see.
I think Core could be the number 2 or 4. I think Green, Ross, and Core lined up together would give defenses fits.
I also think Malone could develop into a quality level starter.
I left LaFell off as he's a band aid.
I think we're in good shape if our top 5 WRs are Green, Ross, Boyd, Core, and Malone. There will be growing pains because of the amount of youth, but I think that's a solid top 5 going forward.
After Eifert, there is a huge drop off at TE. Even if we keep Eifert we'll need someone to produce at TE the other 8 games of the year.