09-02-2017, 12:32 PM
(09-01-2017, 01:30 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Big overreaction and BS statement
Elliott will have a better NFL career than Bullock. I have no doubt. A guy misses a 60 yard field goal 3 yards wide left and he sucks????????????? Ridiculous statement.
Yep. I based my opinion all on 1 kick. He isn't hitting at a 57% clip in preseason. He hasn't had bad reports coming out of practice.
He is getting beaten out by a journeyman.
(09-01-2017, 06:56 PM)BonnieBengal Wrote: I think Elliott is having growing pains, but Bullock is who he is. He's not the guy in game winning situations. If Simmons chooses Elliott, then that means he thinks Elliott will work it out. If he chooses Bullock, then he will be acknowledging he made a mistake with the draft picks. We'll see what happens.
Thanks for being respectful, Bonnie. It's easier to discuss things when people don't react like a hyper-sensitive 3 year old when you say something they don't like.
It could be growing pains, but the Bucs probably thought Aguayo was having growing pains. It's just whether or not you want to take that risk. I'd rather not. We have a good ST coach. I'm confident in Simmons to get young guys ready if they have the ability. Elliott has had all summer and doesn't seem to have that ability. So I don't think it's likely he ever will, and he certainly isn't likely to suddenly flip a switch in a couple weeks.
For me, it's risk/reward. If we roll with Elliott, we could end up sinking an entire season for the sake of a kicker. Let me repeat. A kicker. No thanks. If we win the gamble, we have a decent kicker. If we lose the gamble, Elliott winds up costing us games and possibly a playoff spot. Or we could roll with the guy who is decent now, and keep an eye out for upgrades. Kickers are constantly circulating.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.