Would you rather: $8-10 mill a year to spend on WR2 or TE1?

[*ochocincos*]

(09-13-2017, 05:32 PM)Beaker Wrote: Because hypotheticals are so intellectually stimulating.

Ok, well then let's look at your preference. So from your response of investing $8-10 million in OL over WR2 or TE1, you are saying you'd like to see Eifert not get tagged and walk, and instead using that money on OL? So the receivers would be Green, LaFell, Ross, Boyd, and Core, and the TEs would be Kroft, Uzomah, Hewitt, and maybe a draft pick at TE? Do you think that $8-10 mill spent on OL (assume C or OT) would improve the team more than Eifert or a different receiving threat as 2nd receiving option?