Would you rather: $8-10 mill a year to spend on WR2 or TE1?

[leonardfan40]

(09-13-2017, 05:31 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Not necessarily. Probably an easier way to show what I'm asking is to use two players...

Would you rather:
Emmanuel Sanders (averages 1000 yards, 6 TDs) or Eifert (average around 600 yards, 9 TDs)

Trade off more yards and less risk of injury but less TDs vs fewer yards and high risk of injury but more TDs

Eifert if healthy is going to be better/more valuable than any WR we could sign in FA for an equal contract. If we're talking about his injury history, you'll have to wait and see how this season plays out. At this moment I wouldn't give Eifert a contract of $8 plus mil/yr (what he's worth if healthy), I'd sign him for $6-7/yr if he wants to play it safe, then we have the risk. I doubt he would though so id need to see him stay healthy a yr before giving him a mega deal. If healthy I pay him over a WR any day. The difference between Eifert and our other TE's is greater than the difference between a $8-10 mil WR and what we can get out of Lafell or Boyd or Core/Ross/Malone/etc...plus this team just spent the 9th pick on a WR so no way they sign a WR for $8+ plus mil