Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise › Cincinnati Bengals / NFL › JUNGLE NOISE v
Catch that Wasn't a Catch
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Catch that Wasn't a Catch
*Wyche'sWarrior* Offline
In there like swimwear.....
*

Hall of Fame
Posts: 20,777
Threads: 99
Reputation: 193317
Joined: May 2015
Location: Bluegrass Region

#4
09-15-2017, 04:30 PM
(09-15-2017, 04:28 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Yes if the ball touches but the player has clear control, it's still a catch. However, it looked to me as the ball moved after it touched the ground which I thought meant that it should be considered an incomplete catch.


Yup.....and it was a good challenge by Marv.

"Better send those refunds..."

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Find
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - TKUHL - 09-15-2017, 04:26 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - PhilHos - 09-15-2017, 04:28 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Wyche'sWarrior - 09-15-2017, 04:30 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - TKUHL - 09-15-2017, 04:42 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - BoomerFan - 09-15-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Millhouse - 09-15-2017, 04:34 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - cinci4life - 09-15-2017, 04:34 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Sweetness - 09-15-2017, 05:14 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Tomkat - 09-15-2017, 05:17 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - PhilHos - 09-15-2017, 05:23 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Rattler - 09-15-2017, 05:26 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - firstand10 - 09-15-2017, 05:36 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - corpjet - 09-15-2017, 05:49 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - XenoMorph - 09-15-2017, 06:02 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - XenoMorph - 09-15-2017, 06:01 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Brimey - 09-15-2017, 08:31 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Bfanlc - 09-16-2017, 04:20 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)