Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise › Cincinnati Bengals / NFL › JUNGLE NOISE v
Catch that Wasn't a Catch
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Catch that Wasn't a Catch
Tomkat Offline
Special Teams
********

VIP Bronze
Posts: 2,324
Threads: 147
Reputation: 8794
Joined: Sep 2015
Location: Central Pennsylvania

#12
09-15-2017, 05:17 PM
(09-15-2017, 05:14 PM)Sweetness Wrote: From my understanding the refs aren't allowed to zoom in like they did on TV which was when it became more clear it may not have been a catch. Without that zoom in ability I can sort of see why they couldn't say for certain it wasn't a catch.
I could be totally wrong at that which at that point the refs just suck.

Aren't allowed to zoom in?
Then what's the point of even having replay?
Find
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - TKUHL - 09-15-2017, 04:26 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - PhilHos - 09-15-2017, 04:28 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - TKUHL - 09-15-2017, 04:42 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - BoomerFan - 09-15-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Millhouse - 09-15-2017, 04:34 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - cinci4life - 09-15-2017, 04:34 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Sweetness - 09-15-2017, 05:14 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Tomkat - 09-15-2017, 05:17 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - PhilHos - 09-15-2017, 05:23 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Rattler - 09-15-2017, 05:26 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - firstand10 - 09-15-2017, 05:36 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - corpjet - 09-15-2017, 05:49 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - XenoMorph - 09-15-2017, 06:02 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - XenoMorph - 09-15-2017, 06:01 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Brimey - 09-15-2017, 08:31 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Bfanlc - 09-16-2017, 04:20 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)