Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise › Cincinnati Bengals / NFL › JUNGLE NOISE v
Catch that Wasn't a Catch
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Catch that Wasn't a Catch
*PhilHos* Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Hall of Fame
Posts: 12,199
Threads: 214
Reputation: 56665
Joined: May 2015
Location: Lancaster, PA

#13
09-15-2017, 05:23 PM
(09-15-2017, 05:14 PM)Sweetness Wrote: From my understanding the refs aren't allowed to zoom in like they did on TV which was when it became more clear it may not have been a catch. Without that zoom in ability I can sort of see why they couldn't say for certain it wasn't a catch.
I could be totally wrong at that which at that point the refs just suck.

Aren't replays done in the booth now or something? Isn't the "replay official" that now makes that determination?

If so, why can't HE zoom in?
[Image: giphy.gif]
Find
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - TKUHL - 09-15-2017, 04:26 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - PhilHos - 09-15-2017, 04:28 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - TKUHL - 09-15-2017, 04:42 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - BoomerFan - 09-15-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Millhouse - 09-15-2017, 04:34 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - cinci4life - 09-15-2017, 04:34 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Sweetness - 09-15-2017, 05:14 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Tomkat - 09-15-2017, 05:17 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - PhilHos - 09-15-2017, 05:23 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Rattler - 09-15-2017, 05:26 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - firstand10 - 09-15-2017, 05:36 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - corpjet - 09-15-2017, 05:49 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - XenoMorph - 09-15-2017, 06:02 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - XenoMorph - 09-15-2017, 06:01 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Brimey - 09-15-2017, 08:31 PM
RE: Catch that Wasn't a Catch - Bfanlc - 09-16-2017, 04:20 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)