09-18-2017, 09:37 PM
(09-18-2017, 07:58 PM)Steve Wrote: Mixon in rd #2 is not a wasted pick....
it was the steal of the draft....
& at our spot in rd # 1 there wasn't an OT worthy of that spot.....we would of had to of traded down.....& that's risky & it requires a trading partner.....& we HAD to give Ced a shot at starting at LT....
but perhaps next year we should spend every pick we have on O-line players.....
it just seems this team always wants a garbage center...Every yr I want us to pick one in rd # 2 but when we do pick one its always rd #4....& he's weak.....gets shoved backwards.....SMH.
Mixon might be. But one of Hill and Gio was a wasted 2nd rounder then. 3 RBs selected in the 2nd round in 4 years. One 1,000 yard season. Yikes
(09-18-2017, 08:27 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: LOL, the man is paid to perform regardless who is lines up next to him. And yes, last year next to Whitt he started regressing.
I don't but the guy next to him sucks, so he can suck too. Browns has a OT named Thomas who has crap next to him, but has had a great career and his play did not regress.
He didn't regress. He played with one arm. His shoulder was shot early in the season and he kept playing.
And yes, when you are a good, not great LG and the LT is among the league worst and the center is among the league worst....you will look bad too.
That's how the OL works. You have to be able to be a unit and one bad player can sink an entire OL.
