09-19-2017, 05:25 PM
(09-19-2017, 04:01 PM)Benton Wrote: Eh, isn't the tweet comparing the first two games of 16 (Whit year) versus the first two games of 17 (Whit-less year)?
Good point. I wonder why they didn't use Whit's first two games of 2017, because I actually heard some rumblings about how it is a different offense where the ball doesn't come out as quickly and he had already been beaten badly on a sack.
Bottom line: I wish he was here and we would have another year to draft a replacement, but the Rams offered quite a bit better deal and he jumped at it. I think it is laughable to think he had a better chance of winning there, though.