08-14-2015, 04:21 PM
(08-14-2015, 03:27 PM)Brownshoe Wrote: I honestly don't know the specifics on the case. All I Know is that he was convicted of domestic violence. There still are many many more examples of people with domestic abuse in the league and are still playing.
He was convicted, but that was overturned on the appeal since the girl never showed up to the jury trial. So technically he was never convicted?
I was just saying you cannot compare the Rice and Hardy situations and use Hardy to explain why Rice should be in the league. The situations are too different. This doesn't mean I feel Rice shouldn't be playing.
Another big thing is that Rice looked bad in his last year and is old for a RB. Hardy is younger and played well last we saw.