Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Good Andy/Bad Andy
#27
(10-05-2017, 10:43 AM)hollodero Wrote: AS I said, I admit that much. It is. 
The truth derivated from a QB rating shall not be overrated though. I feel it usually is.

QB rating wouldn't be overrated if it backed your view. Just stop.

(10-05-2017, 11:09 AM)Synric Wrote: System is very important to passer rating also. A team that runs an high percentage west coast offensive (Jay Gruden) is likely to have a QB with a higher passer rating than a team that runs the deep passing Air Coryell (Bruce Arians)...

Just look at the difference in passer rating for Big Ben during the Arians era and the Haley era.

I went ahead and ran the numbers. Gruden's system did feature more short passing. However, Palmer did not pass deep more often than Dalton in the years I looked at (2012 and 2013 for Dalton, 2015 and 2016 for Palmer). Deep to most people is over 20 yards. In the Air Coryell system, it seems the sweet spot is 11-20 yards. Mid-range throws. Palmer did throw a significantly higher percentage of these throws than Dalton, BUT...

Dalton had his highest passer rating on such throws, at a 94.6...which was higher than his rating on short throws. So how does the WCO help again?
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Good Andy/Bad Andy - Shake n Blake - 10-04-2017, 10:39 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - GodFather - 10-04-2017, 10:50 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Shake n Blake - 10-04-2017, 11:07 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - muskiesfan - 10-04-2017, 11:00 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - GreenCornBengal - 10-04-2017, 11:04 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - ShowMeUrTDs - 10-04-2017, 11:18 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Shake n Blake - 10-04-2017, 11:21 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - ShowMeUrTDs - 10-04-2017, 11:27 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Shake n Blake - 10-04-2017, 11:58 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - THE PISTONS - 10-05-2017, 10:03 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Truck_1_0_1_ - 10-05-2017, 12:04 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Nicomo Cosca - 10-05-2017, 12:06 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Joelist - 10-05-2017, 12:22 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Truck_1_0_1_ - 10-05-2017, 10:19 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - hollodero - 10-05-2017, 10:23 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - THE PISTONS - 10-05-2017, 10:29 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - hollodero - 10-05-2017, 10:43 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Synric - 10-05-2017, 11:09 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - THE PISTONS - 10-05-2017, 11:19 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Synric - 10-05-2017, 11:46 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Wyche'sWarrior - 10-05-2017, 12:40 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - THE PISTONS - 10-05-2017, 01:43 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Wyche'sWarrior - 10-05-2017, 11:16 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - hollodero - 10-05-2017, 11:53 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Wyche'sWarrior - 10-05-2017, 12:37 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - PhilHos - 10-05-2017, 01:40 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Shake n Blake - 10-05-2017, 01:58 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Shake n Blake - 10-05-2017, 02:02 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - hollodero - 10-05-2017, 02:40 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Shake n Blake - 10-05-2017, 02:56 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - hollodero - 10-05-2017, 03:22 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Shake n Blake - 10-05-2017, 03:36 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - hollodero - 10-05-2017, 04:31 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Shake n Blake - 10-05-2017, 06:24 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - hollodero - 10-05-2017, 11:32 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - rfaulk34 - 10-05-2017, 09:46 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - rfaulk34 - 10-05-2017, 02:58 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Shake n Blake - 10-05-2017, 03:08 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - rfaulk34 - 10-05-2017, 09:29 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Shake n Blake - 10-07-2017, 01:40 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - rfaulk34 - 10-07-2017, 01:51 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - PDub80 - 10-05-2017, 09:29 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Nicomo Cosca - 10-05-2017, 11:16 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - PDub80 - 10-06-2017, 03:24 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Nicomo Cosca - 10-06-2017, 03:50 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Socal Bengals fan - 10-07-2017, 01:46 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Shake n Blake - 10-07-2017, 02:02 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Wyche'sWarrior - 10-05-2017, 03:08 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - rfaulk34 - 10-05-2017, 09:35 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - bengalfan74 - 10-05-2017, 05:52 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - PhilHos - 10-05-2017, 05:55 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Utts - 10-05-2017, 10:49 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - CornerBlitz - 10-07-2017, 09:28 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Shake n Blake - 10-07-2017, 12:12 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Stonyhands - 10-07-2017, 02:17 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Synric - 10-07-2017, 04:07 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Stonyhands - 10-07-2017, 05:10 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Synric - 10-07-2017, 05:15 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - bengalfan74 - 10-08-2017, 12:34 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Shake n Blake - 10-07-2017, 06:44 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Shake n Blake - 10-07-2017, 11:57 PM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Stonyhands - 10-08-2017, 04:05 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - rfaulk34 - 10-08-2017, 04:49 AM
RE: Good Andy/Bad Andy - Shake n Blake - 10-08-2017, 12:46 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)