Any update on Ross

[*rfaulk34*]

(10-14-2017, 05:27 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: (1)Well as a counter to your counter   ; If what you're doing clearly isn't working, I'd say staying the course would be more of a detriment than switching things up. 

(2)If you game plan for something and the opponent isn't showing what you thought they would, shouldn't you react?

Rather than stick with something that's not working just because you practiced on it?

(3)A sudden 180 in "execution" seems less likely a reason for these drastic halftime turnarounds than "the coaches saw something and made a change or threw in a wrinkle". Just to make it clear, are you saying you think teams adjusting or making changes is a myth? That's how it read to me. 

1. Yup yup.

2. Mos' def

3. I don't think i expressed it properly. I don't think it's a myth at all--whether in-game or halftime--i think there's a combination of doing something different and executing better. I just lean towards better execution when you put them on the scale. Going back to my previous point, when you hear about a halftime adjustment that made the difference, it's usually done by a team that's good more often than not. Of course, you could say a team is that way because they adjust better than their opponents.