10-16-2017, 10:38 AM
(10-16-2017, 10:34 AM)Wyche Wrote: While true, that has nothing to do with the fact that Mike Mitchell is just as, if not more, dirty than Vontaze Burfict. If he is not suspended for this, what's the use of watching anymore? This is an obvious case of favoritism. Blatant.
I agree on Mitchell. Honestly, I think Burfict and the Bengals reputation of bringing in players with Red Flags has a lot to do with it.
Maybe if the Bengals only took a chance on Burfict and Mixon they're ok...but for going on 15 years now they've signed and drafted guys with major red flags.
Is it fair? Absolutely not.
Should Mitchell be suspended? Yes.
But, reputation is playing a role.
I do look for the league to suspend Mitchell.
