Weak Links (According to PFF Ratings)

[Truck_1_0_1_]

(10-20-2017, 01:57 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: #1 - Why do you think PFF rankings are 100% accurate? You seem to insinuate these rankings are the only site that should be used to rank players.

#2 - Absolute worst at their positions? Are all 5 ranked offensive players dead last or are you embellishing again to make a point?

#3 - We have a top 2 defense by every standard so far, so hard to understand how this many of the defenders are so bad?

It would be helpful for those of us who don't have access to PFF if you gave us the ranking + the number of guys ranked.

I am not saying PFF is total BS, but it is one ranking site ranking based on having no clue of the responsibility of a player on every given play and why ML and others like Zimmer has said their rankings are not close to PFF, they have their owns systems which of course we are not privy to that info.

I agree with everything written, save for this.

I debunked this back in like 2011, as you DON'T need to know people's assignments and the like; its not too difficult.

PFF is now absolutely horrid, ratings-wise and yet again, no context to the numbers; the old system was defined and it worked. This one is just inconsistent and flat out wrong at times.