08-16-2015, 05:32 PM
(08-15-2015, 11:43 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Brad, I've been very nice despite the insults about my profession, which are odd considering that you just bragged about not being a child like everyone else. The reason I can be a high school teacher, especially a Social Studies teacher, is because I am capable of distinguishing between an opinion and a fact.How big of a child are you?! How many times on the previous board did you insult my profession, call me a pedophile, and various other unfounded insults, yet someone does it to you and you get all hurt?!
Opinions:
-The NFL should count the Ravens as the same franchise as the pre 1996 Browns
-The NFL should distinguish between the post 1999 Browns and the pre 1996 Browns.
-No one takes anyone but Brad seriously on the Bengals Board.
Fact:
-The Ravens franchise was established in 1996
-The Browns were deactivated for 3 years between 1996 and 1999.
You can give your arguments as to why you THINK or BELIEVE that this should be the case. This is merely your opinion. Your opinion does not change the FACT that the Ravens are not the same franchise as the pre 1996 Browns. This isn't hard. My 9th graders understand the difference. You might not, but, at least the 100+ kids I am responsible for teaching can grasp this concept.
Eat a snickers or something, dude.
Noted.
Where'd the Browns team go if it didn't exist for three years? Did they all just quit the NFL? No, they went to Baltimore, leaving only the name, uniform, and records, along with some front office.
The Ravens were established with the foundation from the Browns, meaning they were the Browns with a different name. Or did every Browns player announce his retirement and then suddenly decide to come play for, ironically, the team that was just formed because the one they retired from deactivated?
You can argue why you THINK or BELIEVE the Browns still have those titles, but the fact is that the franchise that won them was relocated to Baltimore. What relationship to the new Browns have to the old ones, other than a name, location, and uniform? (Leaving out the titles because the point being is that the titles shouldn't be theirs.)
(08-16-2015, 12:14 AM)Tiger Teeth Wrote: I think Brad might need another "timeout", now he's insulting peoples professions to try and proveHe's insulted me on many other more harsh levels, including my profession. But I guess that's allowed?
he's right. Brad, how are you going to argue with 4 or 5 members, plus the NFL? Are you just above admitting you may be wrong?
How are you not following the NFL only allowed the titles to stay in the Browns' name to avoid a lawsuit? THE TEAM MOVED TO BALTIMORE! IT'S A TECHNICALITY!
(08-16-2015, 01:51 PM)Harmening Wrote: Why does this guy worry so much about some sort of dopey 'victory' all the time?
He clearly needs to just bow out of this discussion.
lol.
Pat is the one on the previous board claiming that I claimed victory because I pointed out that he had no answer to one of my points.
He even went around the boards for a month or longer ending all of his replies to my posts with "I claim victory." I was just pointing out how ironic and childish it was for him to do the same thing he accused me of doing when i didn't even do it. But that doesn't fit your agenda or your pre-formed opinions, so you'll ignore it.