08-16-2015, 06:22 PM
Brownshoe
How is Bradford being more durable than McCarron a stretch? Bradford has started 61% of the time (not including pre-season), and McCarron has started 0% of the time (including pre-season, and time as a 2nd stringer)
The Bengals drafted him knowing they would not play him last year, which means he really has missed one preseason game, which he said he could have played in. Yes, he has played 0%, but it's 0/1 and not 0/17.
We'll see what the future brings. Lotta minds made up already. I'm missing the logic of that.
How is Bradford being more durable than McCarron a stretch? Bradford has started 61% of the time (not including pre-season), and McCarron has started 0% of the time (including pre-season, and time as a 2nd stringer)
The Bengals drafted him knowing they would not play him last year, which means he really has missed one preseason game, which he said he could have played in. Yes, he has played 0%, but it's 0/1 and not 0/17.
We'll see what the future brings. Lotta minds made up already. I'm missing the logic of that.
“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe.” ― Albert Einstein
http://www.reverbnation.com/leftyohio singersongwriterrocknroll
http://www.reverbnation.com/leftyohio singersongwriterrocknroll
