McCarron Needs To Play Against Tampa, or forget about it

[Brownshoe]

(08-16-2015, 06:22 PM)McC Wrote: Brownshoe
How is Bradford being more durable than McCarron a stretch? Bradford has started 61% of the time (not including pre-season), and McCarron has started 0% of the time (including pre-season, and time as a 2nd stringer)

The Bengals drafted him knowing they would not play him last year, which means he really has missed one preseason game, which he said he could have played in.  Yes, he has played 0%, but it's 0/1 and not 0/17.  

We'll see what the future brings.  Lotta minds made up already.  I'm missing the logic of that.

We can't afford to put McCarron on the 53 roster, and him not able to play. There is no way we are keeping 3 QBs this season, because we are already going to have to put a few good players on the PS.