Lazor breaks down the lack of Mixon's carries.

[*Wyche'sWarrior*]

(10-24-2017, 01:55 PM)depthchart Wrote: I agree that Lazor brushed it off but should he ?

Establishing Authority as I suggest in Bill Belichick style would need to be applied team wide and just doing it now to Mixon may not help that much if it is not done as a New Principle. I say we need to establish some Authority but we likely won't.

This team has a number of players that like to Spout off after games and the 20 year old Mixon may start a bad pattern if he gets coddled in a way now.

As for Hill, I would expect him to do some thumping if given a 1st half start against the Colts. I doubt it would harm our chances of beating the Colts in the slightest if Mixon watched for the 1st half. It would, however, send Mixon a message that I think he needs to learn now before he becomes a Diva.

I agree with what you're saying......but then I recall Merv stepping all over Paulie G's sack when he called out the vets last season during the bye.  Might as well shitcan the whole bunch, and I've said as much in multiple threads.

That said, the premise of the thread here, is that I appreciated the insight Lazor provided versus hum-drum, giggle, giggle.  After all, Merv is the HC, not Lazor.  Merv did tell Mixon to essentially shut up, so I guess that part was good of him....but I just like the way Lazor opened up his philosophy.  Yeah, his plan didn't work out, but it was a solid plan on the fly, IMO.