08-17-2015, 09:28 AM
(08-17-2015, 08:44 AM)BFritz21 Wrote: It doesn't matter if he legally agreed to relinquish the franchise because he moved the team to Baltimore.
That's a technicality, just as I've been saying. Just because he legally relinquishes the intellectual property, it doesn't change the act of the actual team being moved, along with everything it took to build that team.
Tell me this, do you agree that everything that the Browns ever did and every season that they ever had prior to the move was the same for what became the Ravens?
*Why would I have you on ignore?
I thought you might have had me on ignore because you didn't respond to my last couple of posts and seemed to not have knowledge of the logical arguments they contained. Now I see that you just didn't understand them.
If I understand correctly, you are saying that if someone enters into a settlement to avoid a lawsuit, whatever they agree upon is an invalid technicality because they were pressured to do so.
Let's try that out in another scenario: let's say you threatened to sue one of the people you feel 'defamed' you on a message board. And let's say they sign a legal contract to never mention or reply to you on a message board again so you won't sue. Can they ignore that agreement because it was a 'technicality' that they were forced into?
