Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jerome Simpson Part II?
#10
I just don't know. Ross was solid in college and was a pretty complete wide receiver. People focus way too much on his speed. He is able to do so much more. If he is having trouble learning the playbook, why bother putting him on the field? It's senseless to me to even have him dress if he's not part of the gameplan.

As for practicing, I just find it hard to believe that all of our starting OLine plus Andre constantly practice better than all of our OLine that we make inactive. Our OLine is currently ranked 31st. Would it be so bad to put Johnson at C or try Westerman at G? We see plenty of guys start who don't perform well in games. I find it hard to believe that neither Johnson or Westerman can't allow free runners like Bodine. I truly believe that at least the OLine is all according to Alexander the Great. If that's the case, he HAS to be gone, but he's close with the Brown family.

Lazor said that Lewis decides playing time. We can compare yards per carry all day long, but Mixon is way more explosive than Hill. If nothing else, what Mixon adds to the passing game should be getting him more playing time than Hill. Instead, Hill starts every game and second half.

All of this falls on Marvin. It makes zero sense to not see what Ross has and it makes even less sense to just suit him up as a body and not include him in the gameplan. Honestly, it doesn't look like Green seems to be involved much in the gameplan the last couple of weeks either.

Good coaches play to their strengths and use their weapons. Under Marvin, that doesn't always seem to be the case.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Jerome Simpson Part II? - THE PISTONS - 10-29-2017, 06:44 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - GodFather - 10-29-2017, 06:49 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - Andy2AJ - 10-29-2017, 06:49 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - THE PISTONS - 10-29-2017, 06:50 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - pally - 10-29-2017, 07:23 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - jfkbengals - 10-29-2017, 10:12 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - michaelsean - 10-29-2017, 07:14 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - J24 - 10-29-2017, 07:22 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - THE PISTONS - 10-29-2017, 07:24 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - J24 - 10-29-2017, 11:19 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - CKwi88 - 10-30-2017, 12:37 AM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - rfaulk34 - 10-30-2017, 02:58 AM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - SunsetBengal - 10-29-2017, 07:23 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - SHRacerX - 10-29-2017, 11:24 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - t3r3e3 - 10-30-2017, 12:40 AM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - muskiesfan - 10-29-2017, 07:28 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - Sweetness - 10-29-2017, 07:29 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - THE PISTONS - 10-29-2017, 07:31 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - Sweetness - 10-29-2017, 07:35 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - Pat5775 - 10-29-2017, 07:37 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - Sweetness - 10-29-2017, 07:47 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - bfine32 - 10-29-2017, 07:30 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - PDub80 - 10-29-2017, 09:56 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - Pat5775 - 10-29-2017, 08:23 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - Ravage - 10-30-2017, 01:45 AM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - Rattler - 10-29-2017, 10:00 PM
RE: Jerome Simpson Part II? - Go Cards - 10-30-2017, 02:45 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)