Browns wanted McCarron and were close

[*rfaulk34*]

(10-31-2017, 08:57 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: So losing a guy for nothing is better than something?


That's just weird logic man. 
McCarron is bad. We know this. 

We could have got the first pick in rd2 and rd 3. 

Those are PRIME fodder to move up in the first too.
This trade failing could set this franchise back a lot. (you know, relatively to how far they set themselves back anyways)

That's assuming it was their pick in rd2 and not one they acquired from the Eagles or Texans. 

Would you trade the 1st pick in rd2 (essentially an extended 1)?

I find it highly doubtful.